Friday, February 8, 2013

Harvinder Singh- Written Reflection week 2




Digital media is fast growing in today’s society and it is no wonder Comer, 2011 calls it the “adolescent’s world.” In a time where youngsters are equipping themselves with gadgets such as smart phones and laptops, it is best to allow them to learn and be assessed through it.
    
 The main strategies outlined by Comer, 2011 are the use of twitter and a Cyber-hunt activity.  Comer considers twitter an effective tool as it allows the students to translate their “thoughts and feelings into words”. However, one criticism I would have of using a platform such as twitter is the rigid word cap. Students will be restricted to only a certain number of words in response to any questions I may pose for them online to be answered via this social media platform. One way to curb this problem is to use websites like "paper.li" that work hand in hand with twitter. "Paper.li" allows students to garner information from various sources and create their own newspaper. This newspaper publishes itself on twitter. Thus, students will be able to “follow” the works of one another. This assessment can be framed in a sort of reflection for the weekly lessons where the teacher assigns students newspaper reports on things learnt in class. For instance, a lesson on metaphors can produce an article on “the different sorts of metaphors I can think of” where students write an article on self-created metaphors and give explanations for it.
                
 As this application works well with either twitter or Facebook, teachers can use their twitter/Facebook accounts to write key lesson information. Students will be able to take this information and create an article around it. Thus, the teacher can actually scaffold the students online. If all the twitter accounts of the students are connected to each other, students can also receive updates on articles that are done up by peers so that they can read it and even critique it. Thus, students can help each other to improve as well. It is important for this form of assessment to have a clear rubrics and unit plan. The teacher must ensure students are given strong topics to write about after every lesson. The pieces must be guided by some questions and suggestions by the teacher in order to work.  Another possible limitation to this is the language capabilities of the students. If a student is not proficient in writing good reports, he/she may suffer in undertaking the task. As such, it is important for the teacher, when designing the rubrics to focus on the area of study rather than the writing skills. The writing skills are developed gradually and the teacher should ease the student into this process so that it only becomes a component as the students reach the later parts of the year.
                 
This application serves as a good piece of what Comer, 2011 defines as “authentic assessment”. Parents and other teachers can actually access this media and closely monitor their children’s progress. On top of this, it is relevant to the students’ interest.
              
 For classrooms where the students are not very proficient writers, I would have to use something like podcasts to assess the students. As Ong, 2013 mentions in her piece on “ICT infused learning in a Literature Classroom”, such students may find language a stumbling block to their need to improve their analytical skills. As such, the teacher must strike a balance between written work and the use of digital media. One such idea would be the use of podcasts as mentioned by Comer, 2011. Podcasts allow students to verbalize their thoughts and feelings of a novel and they can easily post it up on podcast hosting websites. They can even post it in blogs or their school’s own Wiki pages.
               
 The advantage of this is to get students gaining the skills needed for literary comprehension without being tied back by their lack of English writing skills. Teachers can ask questions that develop students’ ability to analyze and evaluate without them having to write. This empowers weak writers and they can begin appreciating the subject as their poor writing ability does not stifle their learning anymore. This assessment can also be done in a journaling form where students keep audio journals and reflect on certain questions outlined in the class weekly. One example would be getting students to “Characterize a character from a prose using the evidence they can collect from it". The student would just need to be given access to computer laboratories to create these pieces of inference. This learning also ties in well with assessment as learning since students can refer back to their podcasts as and when they deem it fit.
                 
Of course, even with the use of podcasts, one cannot totally run away from the need to be a decent writer in the final summative traditional assignments that come the way of the students. As such, it is important to note that writing workshops need to occur hand in hand with the podcast exercise.

No comments:

Post a Comment